Above the line covers the creative principals whose deals are negotiated individually and usually agreed before a film is financed: the writer, producer, director and principal cast, plus story and rights costs. Below the line covers everything else: the crew, equipment, locations, facilities, and the physical cost of production.
The line is not a metaphor. On a traditional budget top sheet there is an actual horizontal rule, with a subtotal above it and a subtotal below it, and the two are then added to produce the total.
What sits where
Above the line:
- Story and rights: option payments, purchase price, script clearance.
- Writer, and any subsequent writers.
- Producer, executive producers, and their fees.
- Director.
- Principal cast, meaning the leads and significant supporting roles whose deals are individually negotiated.
- Often the casting director, since casting decisions are made at this level.
Below the line:
- All remaining crew: camera, electrical, grip, art, costume, hair and makeup, sound, AD department, production office, transport, catering.
- Day players, background artists, stunt performers.
- Equipment hire, studio and stage costs, locations, transport, accommodation.
- Post-production: editorial, sound post, music, VFX, grade, deliverables.
- Insurance, legal, financing costs, contingency, and general overheads, which some budgets place in a third block usually called "other" or "below the line other".
Why the line exists
Two reasons, one historical and one practical.
Historically, it comes from the studio system. Above-the-line costs were committed before a picture went into production: the property was bought, the star was under contract, the director was assigned. Below-the-line costs were incurred by the physical act of shooting, and they were the studio's operational business. The distinction reflected who decided what and when.
Practically, it separates two kinds of cost with genuinely different behavior.
Above-the-line costs are negotiated, individual, and largely fixed once agreed. A director's fee does not change because the shoot ran three days over.
Below-the-line costs are rate-based, aggregate, and highly sensitive to the schedule. A crew of sixty on day rates is a number that moves directly with the number of days. This is why the line producer, whose name comes from this line, is responsible for below the line: it is the part that can be planned, controlled, and lost control of.
Above the line is what the film committed to before it started. Below the line is what it spends to actually get made, and it is where a schedule turns into money.
How it affects real decisions
Financing. Financiers look at the above-the-line block to assess the package: who is attached and what they cost. They look at the below-the-line block to assess whether the plan is credible. A budget with a strong package and an implausible below-the-line is a familiar and unwelcome document.
Where cuts land. When a budget has to come down, above the line is difficult to move, because those deals are agreed and the people in them are frequently the reason the film is financeable. So cuts fall below the line, and below-the-line cuts almost always mean fewer shooting days, a smaller crew, or fewer locations. This is the mechanism by which a financing shortfall becomes a harder shoot.
Hiring. Above-the-line people are attached during development, sometimes years out. Below-the-line crew are hired weeks before production, department by department, mostly by the line producer and UPM.
Payment structure. Above the line often involves fees, deferrals, and profit participation. Below the line is predominantly day or weekly rates, with overtime and penalties defined by agreement. See deal memos and rates.
Look at what fraction of a budget sits above the line and you learn a lot. A studio film with major stars might be forty percent or more above the line, which means most of the money is paying for the package rather than for what is on screen. An independent film is frequently ten to fifteen percent, and a micro-budget film may be almost nothing, with the writer, director and producer deferring entirely. A high ratio is not automatically bad, since a star may be exactly why the film is financed and sold. But when a producer looks at a budget and asks how much of this ends up on screen, this ratio is what they are asking about.
The awkwardness of the distinction
It is worth saying that the line encodes a hierarchy that does not always reflect contribution.
A director of photography, a production designer or an editor may shape a film as decisively as the director, and all of them sit below the line. The composer, whose work carries enormous weight in how a film feels, is below the line. So is the entire post-production process, where a great deal of what an audience responds to is actually created.
The distinction is about the structure of deals and the timing of commitment, not about creative importance, and the industry mostly understands that. It is still a language that quietly ranks people, and the terms "above the line" and "below the line" get used socially in ways the accounting never intended.
On a small film
The line still exists on a micro-budget and it looks different.
Typically above the line is nothing or nearly nothing: the writer, director and producer are the same person or people, working for free or for a deferral, and the rights are original. Cast may be paid a modest fee or expenses.
That means essentially the entire budget is below the line, which has one useful consequence: almost every cost on a small film is directly connected to the number of shooting days. Crew, kit, catering, transport, insurance. Add a day and nearly everything moves.
Which produces the single most useful piece of budget advice for a first film: the number of shooting days is the budget. Getting the schedule right is not an administrative exercise adjacent to the money. It is the money.
If you are drawing up your own budget, still split it. Put the deferred creative fees above the line, at their real notional value rather than at zero. It tells you what the film would actually cost if you had to pay for it, which is worth knowing before you have this conversation with a financier on your next one.
Next
The practical question underneath all of this. Next: how few people you can actually make a film with, and what changes at each size.
Get new posts by email
New posts and free templates by email. Unsubscribe in one click.